Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Çظé°ñÀÇ µÎ²² ¹× ¹Ðµµ°¡ ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ 1Â÷ ¾ÈÁ¤µµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸: in vitro

The influence of the cancellous bone thickness and density on the implant primary stability

Journal of Dental Implant Research 2014³â 33±Ç 2È£ p.48 ~ 52
È«½Â¹ü, ±è¹Î¼®, ÀüÅÂÇö, ±è¿µ°¢, Çö±â, ÁÖÃÑ, ÃÖ¿¬Á¶, Àü»óÈ£, ·ùÀçÁØ, ±ÇÁ¾Áø,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
È«½Â¹ü ( Hong Seung-Beom ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ¾È¾Ïº´¿ø Ä¡°ú ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
±è¹Î¼® ( Kim Min-Suk ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÓ»óÄ¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø
ÀüÅÂÇö ( Jeon Tea-Hyun ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ¾È¾Ïº´¿ø Ä¡°ú ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
±è¿µ°¢ ( Kim Young-Kak ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ¾È¾Ïº´¿ø Ä¡°ú ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
Çö±â ( Hyun Ki ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ¾È¾Ïº´¿ø Ä¡°ú ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
ÁÖÃÑ ( Zhou Cong ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÓ»óÄ¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø
ÃÖ¿¬Á¶ ( Choi Yeon-Jo ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ¾È¾Ïº´¿ø Ä¡°ú º¸Ã¶°ú
Àü»óÈ£ ( Jun Sang-Ho ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ¾È¾Ïº´¿ø Ä¡°ú ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
·ùÀçÁØ ( Ryu Jae-Jun ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ¾È¾Ïº´¿ø Ä¡°ú º¸Ã¶°ú
±ÇÁ¾Áø ( Kwon Jong-Jin ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ¾È¾Ïº´¿ø Ä¡°ú ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú

Abstract


Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of the cancellous bone thickness and density on the implant primary stability.

Materials and Methods: The implants used in this experiment were Biotem implants, designed internal submerged tapered (¨ª 4.0 mm ¡¿ 11.5 mm, RBM surface, Seoul, Korea). A total of the 108 Biotem implants were installed into 18 artificial block bone blocks (Sawbones, Pacific Research Laboratories, Washington, USA). The artificial bone blocks were divided depending on density (D3, D4 bone) and each group was divided again into 3 groups according to cortical bone thickness (0 mm, 1 mm, 2 mm). The cancellous bone part of artificial bone blocks were removed leaving 2 mm, 5 mm, 8 mm bone thickness. Then, we inserted the implants on the artificial bone blocks. For each bone block, 6 installation sites were prepared. After inserting the implants, we measured the ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) value with Osstell Mentor. Finally, the 2 way ANOVA was undertaken for statistical analysis (P£¼0.05).

Results: We compared the ISQ values with different density and thickness of cancellous bones. The stabilities on D3 and D4 bones show a statistically significant difference in ISQ values . The thickness of the cancellous bone on D3 showed a statistically significant difference when the thickness of the cortical bone was zero and 1mm. However, the thickness of the cancellous bone on D3 did not show a statistically significant difference when the thickness of the cortical bone was 2 mm. The thickness of the cancellous bone on D4 showed a statistically significant difference when the thickness of the cortical bone was zero. However, the thickness of the cancellous bone on D4 did not show a statistically significant ifference when the thickness of cortical bone was 1mm and 2 mm. The influence of cancellous bone was greater when the quality of bone was greater and the thickness of cortical bone was thinner.

Conclusion: There was a statistically significant difference of the primary stability due to cancellous bone density of D3 and D4 bone. However, there was no statistical significance in the primary stability when cortical thickness was 2mm regardless the thickness of the cancellous bone. The influence of cancellous bone was greater when the quality of bone was greater and the thickness of cortical bone was thinner.

Å°¿öµå

primary stability;cortical bone;cancellous bone thickness and density;ISQ value

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸